山东警察学院学报

在推进轻罪治理体系现代化背景下,刑事速裁程序能够提升诉讼效率、缓解办案压力、保障被追诉人权利,但其本土化发展方向与完善路径还有待明确。基于对两大法系刑事速裁程序的比较,我国刑事速裁程序在发展方向上需保持现有开庭审理模式,应追求公正与效率的动态价值平衡,并立足实现实体真实与案件分流的功能定位。在具体路径上,需关注审前阶段的权利保障及程序速率,重视庭审阶段对被告人认罪认罚自愿性与真实性的审查,并强调现有配套制度的更新。

In the context of modernizing the minor offense governance system, the criminal expedited trial procedure can enhance litigation efficiency, alleviate case-handling pressure, and protect the rights of the accused. However, the direction and path for its localization and improvement are not quite clear. Based on a comparative analysis of the criminal expedited trial procedures in the two major legal systems, the development of China's criminal expedited trial procedure should maintain the current trial mode, strive for a dynamic balance between justice and efficiency, and aim to find out the truth of the case and realize the scientific classification of cases. In terms of specific approaches, it is necessary to focus on the protection of rights and casehandling speed in the pre-trial stage, emphasize the examination of the voluntariness and authenticity of the defendant's confession of guilt and acceptance of punishment during the trial stage, and stress the updating of existing supporting systems.